CHICANO
STUDIES
101
Instructors Notes
Developed by Charlene Garcia Simms
UNIT 3
Review of events -- Unit 2 and Unit 3
The following is a chronology of events that
represent factors that affected Chicanos from the signing of the Treaty
of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848 and well into the 20th Century. These
events are not inclusive but very relevant in the Chicano
experience. Most of these events are also included in Chapters
1-8.
Under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo executed
on February 2, 1848, Mexico ceded to the U. S. a vast territory. The
treaty provided specific guarantees to the Citizens by default for
their property and political rights. They were also given the right to
retain their language religion and culture. According to historian
David Weber, the fact they were guaranteed all the right of citizens
did not prevent them from becoming foreigners in their native
land. The promises of the Treaty of Guadualpe Hidalgo were not
fulfilled.
As the need for more laborers in
railroad, mines, etc. and migrant workers for the farms increased in
the late 1800's and the 1900's we should look at what occurred to the
citizens by default and the first and second group of Mexican
immigrants to realize the need for a Civil Rights Movement in the
1960's.
Laws and Labor Factors:
Prior to 1848 under Spanish Law citizens of Spain and later Mexico were
given land grants. After the Mexican American War the United States did
not honor these land grants and citizens by default were cheated out of
their land by unscrupulous methods, often with the help of newly
enacted U. S. Laws. The majority of Citizens by Default did not
understand the English language nor U. S. law.
1849 - Foreign Miner's Tax (California) - levied a charge to stake out
claims to anyone who was not a U S. citizen. This was one of the most
unfair laws affecting Hispanics.
1851 - The Land Law of 1851 - Congress established a commission to
review the validity of claims in California based on grants made during
the Spanish and Mexican periods. Displacement of land on a grand scale
for Hispanics took place.
1854 - the Surveyor of General Claims Office was established in the New
Mexico territory to resolve land disputes between Hispano and
newcomers. This system was slower than the one in California. At
times it took fifty years to settle just a few claims and in the
meantime Hispanic New Mexicans were defrauded in land scams similar to
those in California, especially by a group who later became known as
the Santa Fe Ring
1855 - Greaser Laws - enacted in California to prohibit bull fights,
bear fights and cock fights. Vagrancy codes in local governments were
also mainly directed at Mexicans and were applied selectively when a
community wanted to force Mexicans out.
1857 - The Cart War of 1857 involved a systematic campaign on the part
of Anglo Americans to force Mexican freighters out of this lucrative
business. For over a year, organized bands of Texans preyed on the
Mexican freight trains, killing the drivers, stealing the merchandise
and generally disrupting the traffic.
1862 - Homestead Act allowed squatters to settle and claim vacant lands
in frontier areas. It was hard for Mexicans to prove that these lands
were theirs and not vacant.
1880 - Mexican immigration to the U. S. was stimulated by the advent of
the railroad. (First group of Mexican immigrants started coming to the
U. S.)
*1882 - Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 - barred immigration from China
*1885 - Alien Contract Labor Law of 1885 prohibited the recruiting and
importation of contract labor from foreign countries.
1892 --Court of Public Land Claims - highly disadvantageous to
Hispanos. The result was that eventually Anglos came to own four-fifths
of the former grant areas.
1897 - Tariff of 1897 raised the tax on imported sugar, dramatically
expanding the growing of sugar beets in the Southwest and Midwest,
increasing the need for migrant workers.
1902 --Reclamation Act of 1902 - put more agricultural land into
production, increasing the need for migrant workers.
*1907 - The Gentlemen's Agreement of 1907 made between the governments
of Japan and the
U. S. where the government of Japan pledged to cooperate in efforts to
limit the immigration of Japanese to the U.S.
1910 - beginning of the Mexican Revolution
1914 - development of the Federal Trade Commission
1917 - World War I - Draft Laws passed
*1917 - The Immigration and Nationality Act set up new restrictions
establishing literacy tests as a condition for entry and a head tax of
$8 . During World War I, "temporary" Mexican farm workers, railroad
laborers and miners were given a waiver to the immigration law so they
could enter the U. S.
*1920 - Temporary Quota Law established quotas for immigration based on
the nationality of immigrants already in the U. S. as of 1910, and set
an upper limit on total immigration from Europe.
*1924 - a permanent Immigration Act set new quotas based on the
proportion of the various nationalities in the U. S. as of 1890. These
were set up to reduce immigration from southern and eastern Europe.
1924 saw the establishment of the Border patrol.
1919-1929 - The border evils - see Chapter II
1929 - Immigration Act - served as partial victory to nativists who had
pressed for a specific Mexican immigration ban throughout the 1920s. It
called for imprisonment of one year for those caught without documents
a second time and a one thousand dollar fine.
1931-1932 - During the worst years of the Great Depression, thousands
of Mexicans were repatriated only to find themselves destitute in
Mexico. Some of these people repatriated were
U. S. citizens.
1933 -- National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 - encouraged workers
to form unions and bargain collectively. Mexicans were excluded from
participating in trade unions. If they formed their own unions their
efforts were squelched with violence followed by deportations.
1933 - National Labor Relations Act of 1933 - guaranteed the right to
organize and bargain collectively.
1935 - Founding of the Congress of Industrial Organizations - signaled
the coming of big industrial unions.
1938 -- Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 - minimum wage--caused many
Mexicans to lose their jobs.
1942 - Bracero Program - represented a planned and orderly process of
labor recruitment with Mexican laborers from Mexico.
1951 - Public Law No. 78 - extended the Bracero program after the war
under a labor shortage caused by the Korean War.
1954-58 - Operation Wetback - deported 3.8 million persons of Mexican
descent. Only a few were allowed deportation hearings.
The Mexican Revolution (prior and during) brought the most dramatic
development to the U. S. because 10% of Mexico's population moved north
and they fit into the existing labor colonial structure. Americans made
no distinctions between the new arrivals and those who had become
citizens by default after the Mexican American War. Those allowed in,
wound up staying; some due to labor shortages; the majority settled in
the Southwest, although some did go northeast to work in the steel
mills in Pennsylvania; automobile factories in Detroit, etc. The
experiences of these people were different than those who settled in
the Southwest and merits different study from Chicanos in the
Southwest. The people from Mexico had been largely agricultural
workers. Other occupational categories for the new immigrants were
teamsters, freighters, woodcutter, stonemasons, shoemakers, miners.
I mentioned the revolving door factor--meaning that when we need labor
from Mexico we open the door wide open but as soon as we don't need the
labor we push them out. There are several push-pull factors from both
sides. Some of the push factors coming from Mexico and the pull
factors from the U. S. in the past have been:
Push factors (from Mexico)
1. The political upheaval associated with the Mexican Revolution
2. Social and economic factors such as the population growth in Mexico.
3. Improvement in infrastructure especially the railroad made it easier
and cheaper to travel
4. Building and maintenance of the railroads led to employment in the
southwest railroads.
5. Inflation increased -- real wages to workers declined
6. Modernization displaced farm workers providing a surplus of laborers
in Mexico
7. American capital investment in Mexico continued -- the Hearsts, the
Guggenheims, U. S. Steel, Anacona Corporation, Standard Oil. By 1910
American investment in Mexico had grown to a billion dollars exceeding
the total capital owned by the Mexicans themselves. (Mostly export
products made them responsible for the push as well as the pull side)
Pull factors (form the U.S.)
1. Southwest employers wanted cheap labor and labor which could be
manipulated in ways beneficial to the employers The demand was not for
labor but for wage labor.
2. Mexican labor and Mexican immigration was conditioned by the
relative non-availability of other sources of cheap labor during this
period.
3. Labor contractors - recruiters (quite often unscrupulous-coyotes,
man snatchers, enganchistas see page 44 of Chicano) - the pull was an
active and aggressive force. It set the pattern for the waves of
Mexican immigration that continues through today.
4. Immigration policies (shown by asterisks* in chronology)
How did all this affect Mexican immigration? It increased the demand
for Mexican labor. Some Mexicans were made exempt form some of these
immigration policies. Some employers ignored the laws. There were
several efforts to control Mexican immigration and by 1929 were ordered
to follow these laws. There were restricitonist forces who feared the
continued importation of "inferior and culturally different foreigners"
(Xenophobia). This attitude brought about the passage of the
Immigration Law of 1929. However, the employers were on the other
extreme--they wanted the cheap labor.
Chicano Labor is a study in itself. I have barely touched on it. It is
important to understand its implication to Mexican immigrants and
Mexican Americans. A desire by employers to keep their conditions
status quo as well as the hardships these people went through to get
out of the pattern of employment of low wages, worst jobs, etc. needs
to be understood. Chicanos were also dealing with repatriation
and deportation. Unionization was the next battle Mexican-Americans and
newly arrived Mexicans would have to battle.
The Second Defeat:
Like other minorities under similar circumstances, Mexicans tried to
minimize contacts with dominant groups by withdrawing into their own
world. Falling into a world of subordination, immigrants attempted to
rebel.
These people were set apart as a caste, stereotyped, segregated, and
regarded as an inferior race. Between 1900 and 1930 they started to
organized for self-protection mainly in California. Most attempts were
stopped, broken by the use of violence and was followed by deportation.
The suppression of these strikes represented in effect, a second
defeat, a second rebuff.
When Mexicans in the United States got on relief, efforts to get
them off relief involved large scale forced repatriations to Mexico.
Some of the people were American citizens but if you looked Mexican you
were put in a box car or other means of transportation and shipped
south regardless of where you had been born. Ironically, the people who
went to Mexico had gotten a lot of experience in organizing when they
tried to unionize in the U. S. They used this experience to
organize in Mexico and the Mexican labor movement dates back to these
attempts.
The Mexican Problem
The Mexican Problem had been defined in terms of the social
consequences of Mexican immigration; statistics of Mexican delinquency,
poor housing, low wages, illiteracy and rates of disease. Mexicans
became the No. l immigration problem. The focus was on the consequences
instead of the causes. There was little attempt to look at Mexican
immigration as different from European immigration.* With Mexican
immigration there is a time factor and a space factor. There were also
schisms between Mexicans - those native born and the new immigrants.
Those who were native born had started to assimilate. The new
immigrants brought a heavy element of their old culture with them.
*Mexico is not France, Italy or Poland. Geographically, it is part of
the Southwest. Geography alone indicates that Chicanos "cannot be
regarded as merely another immigrant group in the U. S. destined for
ultimate absorption." There has to be a merge or fusion. It must be
remembered that the process of acculturation is somewhat different in
the southwest than elsewhere in the U. S. Here we adopted the
Spanish-speaking minority; they did not adopt us. It is this difference
which accounts for the tenacity with which the Spanish speaking have
clung to certain aspects of their native culture."
The pattern of employment for Chicanos was low wages; quite often it
was not only an individual who was employed but a group or an entire
family; the jobs were undesirable by location, often dead end type of
employment; and the; employment was often seasonal or casual. This type
of employment dictated the type and location of residence. Segregated
residential areas resulted in segregated schools. This perpetuated
stereotypes. (We already went through one example of segregation
in The Lemon Grove Incident) Exclusion from the trade unions closed
another avenue of escape.
The Colonia Complex
The colonias were formed when the second group of Chicanos started to
arrive in the U. S. Most of us know them as barrios or Mexican
neighborhoods. They generally have been located "on the other side of
the tracks," certainly determined by low wages, cheap rents, low land
valued, prejudice, closeness to employment, undesirability of the site,
etc. The houses, or in reality shacks, were generally unpainted,
weather-beaten and dilapidate. They were very clean and neat on the
inside with much effort to make them look attractive. In the past most
had no inside toilets and baths nor electricity. They were located at
just sufficiently inconvenient distances from the parent community. The
physical isolation naturally bred a social and psychological isolation.
Resentment of living a fenced in character of their existence
developed. They were aware of not being wanted and segregation was
enforced by law as well as by custom and opinion. The ostracism of the
Mexican had great affect on their feelings of who they were. If they
have projected an inferiority complex it is really a defeatist attitude
arising from frustration at being unable to break out of this cycle.
Children dropped out of school for several reasons, one being
segregation and an inferior education they were being provided. So,
sometimes the result has been to remain in the cycle of poverty, low
wages, poor housing, etc. While lack of funds, the language difficulty,
and illiteracy were important factors to this despair, most influential
were segregation and discrimination. The new generations, however,
showed lively interest to improve their socio-economic status.
Source: North from Mexico by Carey McWilliams
The early 40's
We discussed last week what was going in the early 40's
1. Lazaro Cardenas stopped some U. S. corporations from coming into
Mexico. This angered newspaper mogul Hearst.
2. Pearl Harbor was attacked
3. U. S. entered World War II
4. 120,000 residents of Japanese ancestry were forced to internment
camps; 70,000 of them U. S. citizens.
5. Bracero Program was initiated
6. Sleepy Lagoon incident in Los Angeles
7. Round up of Mexican teenagers in L.A. for the murder of Jose Diaz. A
Kangaroo Court was held for the boys.
8. Convictions took place. Two years later everyone was
exonerated.
9. Zoot Suit Riots
The Case of Sleepy Lagoon
A young man by the name of Jose Diaz was murdered. Boys from the 38th
Street Gang were arrested and nine were convicted of second degree
murder plus two counts of assault. The served two years in San Quentin
before they were exonerated. Others were convicted of lesser crimes and
only did jail time.
Some of the criminals, the boy gangsters, the murders involved in the
Sleepy Lagoon Case were:
1. Henry Leyvas, 20, worked on his father's ranch.
2. Chepe Ruiz, a fine amateur athlete who wanted to play big league
baseball. In May 1942, his head had been cracked open by the butt of a
policeman's gun when he had been arrested on suspicion of robbery,
although later he was found not guilty of the charge. While in San
Quentin, he won the admiration of the warden, the prison staff and the
inmates when he continued on in a boxing match, after several of his
ribs had been broken.
3. Robert Telles, eighteen, was working in a defense plant at the
time of his arrest. He was an amazing artist and showed remarkable
skill as he drew caricatures of the judge, the all white jury and the
prosecutor during the trial.
4. Manuel Reyes, 17, had joined the Navy in July 1942 and was
waiting induction when arrested.
5. Angel Padilla, one of the defendants most severely beaten by the
police, was a furniture worker.
6. Henry Ynostras, 18 was married and the father of a one year old
girl. He had supported his mother and two sisters since he was fifteen.
7. Manual Delgado, 19, also a woodworker, was married and the father of
two children, one born on the day he entered San Quentin.
8. Gus Zamora, 21 was also a furniture worker.
9. Victor Rodman Thompson, 21, was an Anglo young man who by long
association with the Mexican boys in his neighborhood had become
completely Mexicanized.
10. Jack Melendez, 21 had been sworn into the Navy before he was
arrested. He got a dishonorable discharge.
11. John Matuz, 20, had worked in Alaska with the U. S. Engineers.
These boys had been pushed around by the police, given a rough
time in the court and the Sleepy Lagoon prosecution capped the
climax. The court was tried before a biased and prejudiced judge,
conducted by a prosecutor who pointed the clothes and style of
haircuts of the defendants as evidence of guilt and was staged in
an atmosphere of intense community wide prejudice which had been
whipped up and artfully sustained by the entire press of L. A.
They were not allowed to sit with their counsel only permitted to
communicate with them during recess or after adjournment. For the first
weeks of the trial the defendants were not permitted to get haircuts
and packages of clean clothes were intercepted by the jailer on orders
of the prosecutor. They came to trial unkempt, looking like
vagabonds. They were also tried as a group, not individually.
On October 3, 1944, the District Court of Appeals, in a unanimous
decision reversed the conviction of all the defendants and the case was
later dismissed for lack of evidence. In its decision the court
sustained all but two of the contentions the Sleepy Lagoon Defense
Committee had raised, castigated the trial judge for his conduct
of the trial and criticized the methods by which the prosecution had
secured a conviction.
Mexican Americans boys never used the term zoot-suit, preferring drape
in speaking of their clothes. The drapes began to appear in the late
30's and early 40's. They resembled the zoot-suits worn by Black young
people in Harlem, although there were differences in detail and design.
They were very functional and used specifically for dancing which would
be disastrous to the average suit. The trouser cuffs are tight around
the ankles in order not to catch on the heels of the boy's quickly;
moving feet. The shoulders of the coat are wide, giving plenty of room
for strenuous arm movements and the shoes are heavy, serving to anchor
the boy to the dance floor as he spins his partner around. For the
boys, peg-topped pants with pleats, high waists up under the armpits,
the long loose-backed coat, thick sole blucher shoes and ducktail
haircut. For the girls, black huarachas, short black skirt, long black
stockings, sweater and high pompadour, the length of the coat and the
width of the shoulders became as much a mark of prestige as the merit
badges of boy scouts. Important to note that not all
young Mexican Americans wore them.
Zoot Suit Riots or Military-Government-Police Riots?
Players (elements of the Zoot Suit Riots):
1. Xenophobia
2. Pachucos - boys of Mexican descent, many 1st generation, rarely over
18
3. Police - overwhelmingly non-Mexican. Acting on reliance of Captain
Ayers theory
4. Newspaper - media yellow journalism at its worst. It was a dull
period, major war going on; looking for a scapegoat, an internal enemy
on which accumulated frustrations of a population could be vented.
5. People of L. A. Sponsoring a private war, Mexican and non-Mexican
6. Military - on leave with full pay - bored; strangers supported by
the police and media.
Captain E. Duran Ayers, Chief of the Foreign Relations Bureau of the
L.A Sheriff's office presented a report presumably prepared under the
instructions of his superiors during the Sleepy Lagoon Trial. He was
called to the stand to explain his theory of the Mexican's inborn love
for killing and violence, in other words, the biological factors. He
basically said that when Anglo-Saxons fight they use their fists. When
Mexicans fight they have a need to use a knife or lethal weapon. They
have a desire to kill or at least let blood, a characteristic inherited
from their Aztec ancestors.
The stereotype of the evil Pachuco formed in the minds of many L. A.
residents.
One police lieutenant offered the following rational for the gang
crimes: "Crime is a matter of race and the tendency to commit crimes
can be inherited. Therefore, the race must be punished."
Some people called the Zoot-Suit Riots, a race riot, and were
immediately labeled communists. Even Eleanor Roosevelt called it a race
riot and was severely criticized. Meanwhile her husband had just held a
historical meeting in April with Mexican president Camacho on the soil
of Mexico to develop the Good Neighbor Policy.
Ten days of rioting took place in L. A. in the summer of 1943 and we
hardly hear about it in our history books including the text you are
using!. According to Carey McWilliams in North from Mexico, "What the
riots did was expose the rotten foundations upon which the City of Los
Angeles had built a paper-mache facade of International American Good
Will made up of fine-sounding Cinco deMayo proclamations. During the
riots, the press, the police, the officialdom and the dominant control
groups of Los Angeles were caught with the bombs of prejudice in their
hands. The riots left a residue of resentment and hatred in the minds
and hearts of thousands of young Mexican Americans in Los Angeles."
Most important, the incident helped to build the foundation for the
Chicano Movement. These young men would remember the humiliation of the
Zoot Suit Riots and demanded full rights of citizenship.
The War Years - The war provided Mexican American an opportunity to
prove their loyalty to their country. Several medal of honor winners
emerged. Some heroes were:
1. Joe Martinez
2. Macario Garcia, a medal of honor winner was refused service in a
restaurant in Texas because he was Mexican.
3. Felix Longoria - his body was refused burial in Three Rivers Texas
after being killed in the Philippines. Longoria had been a medal of
honor recipient. Lyndon B. Johnson intervened and Longoria was buried
at Arlington Cemetery in Washington D. c.
4. Sylvestre Herrera
5. Dr. Hector P. Garcia, founder of the American G. I. Forum
What was the counterpoint of migration? While the Good Neighbor Policy
was being preached, discrimination was running rampant against Mexican
Americans and Mexican Nationals. Texas was forbidden access to Braceros
because of their discriminatory practices so they used undocumented
workers for their labor.
Los Braceros -- In August of 1942, both Mexico and the U. S. set forth
conditions which Mexican labor might be recruited for wartime
employment limited to agricultural employment. These workers helped
harvest practically every major crop; in addition 80,000 Mexicans were
recruited as maintenance workers on the railroad. The farm labor
importation ended on December 31, 1947, with the option to renew the
agreement which in time was. The Bracero Program did not officially end
until 1964. Millions and millions of Bracers worked in the U. S.
What was the real crux of the Mexican Problem? The pattern of
discrimination in employment, in the schools and in civic life
throughout the borderlands continued. "So long as the Mexican knows
that he may be killed with impunity by any American who chooses to kill
him, then all our talk about being good neighbors is merely paying lip
service to a friendship we both know is a joke." The president of
Mexico pleaded that Mexicans be given quality of opportunity. If not,
there could be no good neighborly relations between Mexico and the U. S.
What started occurring? Grass Roots democracy -- organizing from the
bottom up - self-determination -- refusal to be treated like second
class citizens any longer --organizations such as CAO-Community action
groups. LULAC had been active since the late 1920's.
Changes from World War II
World War II brought about dramatic changes to Chicanos. The war effort
created earlier undreamed of opportunities for education, jobs,
training, and economic advancement for Chicanos. Involvement in World
War II strengthened their sense of citizenship, which in turn resulted
in organizational development focusing on civil rights.
The war against the fascist powers and the tremendous demand for labor
that it created, plus efforts of the War Manpower Commission and the
Fair Employment Practices Committee helped to reduce open
discrimination against Chicanos in employment and they were not totally
excluded from unions anymore. However, after the war Chicano veterans
were still met with discrimination and little increase in social
acceptance. The difference now was that these veterans who had
been willing to die for their country were no longer going to accept
second class citizenship. They devoted their energies to goals of
personal, social and economic improvement, in other words they lay the
groundwork for the upcoming period, The Politics of Protest.
Urbanization also took -place--moving from rural areas to the city.
A very positive development was the founding of American G. I. Forum
founded under the leadership of Dr. Hector Garcia. The forum initially
for Mexican descent veterans soon found itself leading voter
registration drives, filed lawsuits against civil and social
discrimination, especially against segregation in Texas schools.
After a hundred years since the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe
Hidalgo there was recognition that the treaty had not been honored. It
was the beginning of action programs to help Chicanos. Public attention
also began to focus on the Anglo-Hispano relations in the entire
Southwest. The Mexican Problem started being viewed as the
Anglo-American problem. Throughout southern California, Mexican
Americans began moving toward a new awareness, a new consciousness of
their rights as U. S. citizens and "gaining access to the proverbial
piece of the pie."
top | home | © 2005
El Escritorio